History, Geography, Baseball.
We've got it all.
BUTTER UP!
Drawing new lines for wine on the Sonoma Coast
Jon Bonné04/03/11
For Pinot Noir, Joseph Phelps winery banked on Freestone,... Peay Vineyards in Annapolis,
an area that could have its ...
When is the coast not necessarily the coast? When it's marked on a bottle of Sonoma
wine, apparently.
In wine terms, the Sonoma Coast appellation has been a mess since its approval in 1987. It
stretches over 750 square miles, from the eastern end of San Pablo Bay, on Napa's
edge, to the far northern reaches of Sonoma's actual coast, near the hamlets of
Annapolis and Gualala. Along the way it engulfs most of Russian River Valley, Green
Valley, the Sonoma portion of Carneros and nearly half of Sonoma County.
The original motives of the appellation are draped in the sort of politics that attend so
many American Viticultural Areas, or AVAs. The original intent, as always, was to
delineate a growing region with unique character. But the map for this particular sprawl
of an appellation was largely sketched to include the vineyards of Sonoma-Cutrer, which
needed an area that encompassed its winery and farther-flung vineyards for the
"coastal" Chardonnay it promoted in the 1980s."It's big," says
Brice Jones, Sonoma-Cutrer's founder, of the Sonoma Coast, "but it's true
to the purpose of having appellations."
In subsequent years, every logical twist has been applied to explain this
draw-outside-the-lines appellation: the predominance of certain soils, the impact of ocean
wind through the gap in the coastal range near Petaluma (the Petaluma Gap is now pushing
for its own appellation, of course), the presumptive cool climate.
"We felt the Sonoma Coast appellation was beginning to be used on wines for marketing
purposes, and wasn't being used on wines that showed the natural style of the
area," says Carroll Kemp of Red Car, which has vineyards in remote Fort Ross.
"In that sense, it is deceptive."
So there's what has come to be called the "true" Sonoma coast - vineyards
within a few miles of the Pacific coastline that, as it happens, are defining spots for
some of the country's top Pinot Noir and Chardonnay. This includes names like Hirsch,
Peay, Flowers and Marcassin, along with wineries like Littorai, Williams Selyem, Kistler
and Freestone - all together a litany of California outperformers.
At long last, many have had it with the funny geography. Last month they unveiled a new
organization, the West Sonoma Coast Vintners (see more at
westsonomacoast.com) with two
dozen members and its own festival to be held in August in Occidental.
This is hardly the first attempt to bring order to the gerrymandered blob of the Sonoma
Coast. Around 2002, several of the group's founding members submitted a proposal for
a Fort Ross-Seaview appellation that included coastal ridges from Cazadero to Annapolis.
That effort was shot down after concerns were raised by Jones, some of whose vineyards
were excluded, along with Fort Ross Vineyards, who saw its brand name imperiled, and
Hartford Family Winery, who similarly had vineyards outside the dotted line.
There are hopes that Fort Ross-Seaview will rise again. Efforts for Freestone-Occidental,
an appellation south of the Russian River, are coming along, as are plans for an Annapolis
appellation to the north, a Sebastopol Hills area south of the Bodega Highway (see
sfg.ly/dRRaxo) and the Petaluma Gap.
But for now, the new group's creators have moved to other tasks. They would rather
promote the common culture of West County than start marking up maps once again. So they
have devised a large, and unofficial, "West Sonoma Coast" area, with Highway 116
as a dividing line that cuts northwest through Sebastopol and Forestville.
Their hope is that rather than mire themselves in more bureaucracy, they can take their
case directly to their customers.
"Looking at it from my point of view and some of my neighbors, we don't really
care anymore," says David Hirsch of Hirsch Vineyards, who spearheaded the original
Fort Ross-Seaview effort.
"There's been a learning curve around the real Sonoma Coast versus the generic,
so I'm not sure how much interest there'll be in putting these AVAs on the
label."
Hirsch's point is salient: When you look at the roster of the West Sonoma Coast
posse, most names are easily recognizable. And you realize the repercussions of this
bureaucratic mess: Vintners who couldn't get brand leverage with an appellation
simply built their own reputation. People might seek out a Hirsch or Peay or Flowers, but
probably not because it says "Sonoma Coast" on the label.
Still, there are good reasons to begin the subdivision. While there is some similarity
among the jumble of soil types, the moderating influence of the ocean and relative
elevation of these various areas make the biggest difference in style.
According to Patrick Shabram, the geographer who wrote both the Fort Ross-Seaview and
Freestone-Occidental proposals, a major divide exists between Fort Ross' ridgetops,
generally above 1,000 feet, and lower-elevation vineyards in Annapolis. Most Fort Ross
sites, including Hirsch, Flowers and the eponymous Fort Ross Vineyards, receive full days
of sunlight, while lower sites are often stuck in the fog.
"You can think of it a little bit like the Napa Valley," Shabram says.
"Everybody realizes that there is the Napa Valley, which is this great wine-growing
region, but there are differences between Carneros and Calistoga."
The Coasters have taken a key lesson from Napa's own geographic wars, plus the battle
between the east and west sides of Paso Robles. Napa's subdivision largely by town
boundaries left the feds skeptical about the abuse of the appellation process. So the West
Sonoma Coast has opted to step back and sort out its business before getting mired in
another tangle of red tape.
Which is why last week Kemp and Andy Peay of Peay Vineyards found themselves traversing
another coast - the East Coast - with a road show about the new game plan for what
previously was dubbed the "true Sonoma Coast."
The new group's informal boundaries have their own arbitrary issues, but to Peay
there's a more crucial definition of the West Sonoma Coast - the inability to make
cheaper, large-scale wine out in the far coastal reaches, in part because of farming costs
and perennially low crop yields prevent it, and in part because land regulations in former
timber areas limit possible new plantings. Most wineries in these parts are actual estates
willing to take financial risks for high-dollar wines.
As you've probably deduced, the fight for the coast is hardly over. New appellation
filings haven't exactly been frozen, but first the association's founders would
rather try to really cmprehend what makes each slice of the far coast unique. They want to
compare their wines, share farming notes and - crucially - finally convince people who
live farther afield that "Sonoma Coast" doesn't actually mean that much at
all.
"We're at the exploratory stage of this. We're at the beginning," Peay
says. "I'm not sure why our wines are the way they are. We're
learning."
After the years of bureaucratic battles, perhaps that's the smartest way forward for
the true Sonoma coast.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/03/FD821IMPRL.DTL
Sonoma Coast Chardonnay: The Chronicle Recommends
Jon Bonné04/03/11
Valley of the Moon wine as seen in San Francisco, Califor... Hirsch Vineyards wine as seen
in San Francisco, Californi... La Follette Sangiacomo Vineyard wine as seen in San
Franc... Failla Estate Vineyard wine as seen in San Francisco, Cal... More...
Plenty of good could be found in 2009 as a vintage on the coast - a moderate late season
and relatively smooth sailing after a hope-crushing 2008 vintage. So as coastal
Chardonnays emerge on the scene, here's a chance to get a first snapshot.
There is much to like - in some corners. Our tasting almost seemed divided in half,
between wines that use the omnibus nature of the enormous Sonoma Coast appellation to make
large-lot Chardonnay, and tiny, brilliantly crafted efforts that largely relied on the
hard-to-farm parcels within a few miles of the coast.
The coastal appellation is big enough to embrace both approaches. The quality from
'09 indicates that in addition to the Sonoma Coast being prodigious Pinot territory,
it's a spot to rely on for benchmark Chardonnay.
2009 Valley of the Moon Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($14): A proper example of the
wide-reaching Sonoma Coast approach from this Korbel-owned label, using fruit from Russian
River Valley, Carneros and other far corners that fall under the coastal appellation. A
steely lemon and chive profile.
2009 Hirsch Vineyards Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($50): Hirsch's latest estate effort
relies on its dramatically powerful fruit from 3.9 acres planted in 1994 and 2006. New
winemaker Ross Cobb oversaw this vintage, once again made in a unique mix of oak, steel
and small glass vessels. A touch shy at first, but then its eloquent power hits with a
saline, mouthwatering presence. Glossy stone fruit edged with thyme, green apple and
quince, and layer upon layer of tangy fruit.
2009 La Follette Sangiacomo Vineyard Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($30): For his own label,
consultant Greg La Follette turns to the vineyard run by the Sangiacomo brothers outside
Petaluma. An impressive and restrained stony crunch, with toasted oat, thyme and fig, and
a honeyed touch that enriches an edgy core of fruit.
2009 Failla Estate Vineyard Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($44): Ehren Jordan's own
vineyard sits on the far west near the coast, producing intense dry-farmed Chardonnay. No
surprise this taut effort takes time to emerge from its shell. A hint of savory wood on
the nose and stony accents: granite and marjoram amid kaffir lime, lemon confit and pear
skin. Then comes tremendous power on the palate - an intense core of mineral-accented
fruit, with awesome density. Give it another two years to approach its peak.
2009 Peay Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($40): Vanessa Wong and the Peay brothers mixed 60
percent fruit from their Annapolis estate with 40 percent from the Hirsch and Campbell
Ranch sites - a trio of coastal heavy hitters. The texture sells it: plenty of fruit
richness without relying on lees or wood notes. Intense, precise flavors, with a smoky and
stony countenance. Pine bark, fig and key lime, with melony richness to balance. Give it a
good three years to improve.
2009 MacPhail Gap's Crown Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($45): James MacPhail brings his
full-bore approach to Chardonnay from this well-known Petaluma site. A florid, oak-touched
style - creme brulee, tree fruit and lemon rind, with a savory punch.
2009 Flowers Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($45): Flowers' larger-production bottling uses
its own Camp Meeting Ridge site and a handful of other far-west coastal properties,
fermented mostly in older French oak. Wonderfully opulent, with Cavaillon melon, lime
zest, honey and vanilla curd, plus a stony twinge. Its power comes from that density of
fruit more than evident oak (25 percent new).
2009 Sonoma-Cutrer Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($24): This large-production - over 80,000
cases - effort from the label that first lobbied for the Sonoma Coast name uses a wide mix
of sites, with a slice (20 percent) of new oak. This is a prototype for built-to-please
Chard: heathery and citrus-driven, with weight to the pear and zesty lemon fruit.
2009 Cartha Sonoma Coast Chardonnay ($27): Winemaker John Raytek (Ceritas) paired with
vineyard manager Glenn Alexander for this new Petaluma Gap-focused project, the name of
which is Sanskrit for "those who do the work." Cool and minty, with an emerging
toast, plus dried peach, sandalwood and hay. Dense and almost cloudy, with powerful fruit
all through.
Panelists: Jon BonnéChronicle wine editor; Pierre Gulick, sales representative, Dee Vine
Wines; Luke Kenning, wine director, Farallon.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/04/03/FD821IMGQF.DTL
--
------------------------------
* Dr. James Ellingson, jellings(a)me.umn.edu *
* mobile : 651/645-0753 *
* Great Lakes Brewing News, 1569 Laurel Ave., St. Paul, MN 55104 *
* james(a)brewingnews.com James.Ellingson(a)StThomas.edu *