Ned, and have never taken the least pains to explain, the principles of
either establishing or maintaining a commonwealth; and they look on this
practical science as one which belongs not to men of learning and
wisdom, but to those who have made it their especial study. How, then,
can it be reasonable for such men to promise their assistance to the
State, when they shall be compelled to it by necessity, while they are
ignorant how to govern the republic when no necessity presses upon it,
which is a much more easy task? Indeed, though it were true that the
wise man loves not to thrust himself of his own accord into the
administration of public affairs, but that if circumstances oblige him
to it, then he does not refuse the office, yet I think that this science
of civil legislation should in no wise be neglected by the philosopher,
because all resources ought to be ready to his hand, which he knows not
how soon he may be called on to use. VII. I have spoken thus at large
for this reason, because in this work I have proposed to myself and
undertaken a discussion on the government of a state; and in order to
render it useful, I was bound, in the first place, to do away with this
pusillanimous hesitation to mingle in public affairs. If there be any,
therefore, who are too much influenced by the authority of the
philosophers, let them consider the subject for a moment, and be guided
by the opinions of those men whose authority and credit are greatest
among learned men; whom I look upon, though some of them have not
personally governed any state, as men who have nevertheless discharged a
kind of office in the republic, inasmuch as they have made many
investigations in
Show replies by date