Steve-
Agreed. I have a similar experience. I think I entered 3 or 4 contests and
came away skunked (me, hopefully not my beer!) before I ever won a single
medal. But having entered, I started meeting the local brewers, and talking
to the ones who WERE winning Every Single Time, and to some who never even
entered, but still made GREAT beer! And I learned a LOT from their
suggestions, and I am grateful to every one of them (Piatz, Ruggles, Larson,
Sinnen, Stock, Weiland, Swalinkavich, Schlegel, Krug, Oftel, Glewwe, Nelson,
Vitt, Ruud, Taylor, Valentiner, Nilles, Gunderson, Fletty, England, Cotton,
Eibner, Mikkelson, Hewitt, Exire LaTour, ... who am I leaving out??)
Probably a few dozen more I've learned from. There's a list of local
"experts" for those of you seeking help with your brewing!
I also agree that "Book L'arning" about beer will only take you so far. I
think everyone I've ever met in the Twin Cities had been very generous and
helpful about anything I've ever asked about beer and brewing. I actually
think that extends to the beer community nationally, which I've just been
exposed to over the last 2 or 3 years. Just about anywhere you go, brewers
are more than happy to talk about and help you with beer, techniques, and of
course, gadgetry. :-D
I think the myth about some people leaving out a key ingredient in a shared
recipe, keeping some special brewing "secret", or passing on incomplete or
incorrect information about brewing techniques is mostly that, a myth. And
if there are any people like that - well, I mostly just feel sorry for them.
They don't get it, and they won't ever really be part of the
"brotherhood"
that is the beer brewing fraternity.
Having said that, Winning is still good! ;-D And it's in the nature of the
friendly competition that John laid down his challenge to QUAFF's supremacy
in the AHA Club of the Year cup. He was following thru on a pact made two
years ago by a lot of people. Well, it's off now, and that's OK. Enter as
whichever club you will, but the battle has been joined! It may not be this
year, or even next year that someone poses a serious challenge to QUAFF.
Their model is valid - and we too can help make better brewers, make better
clubs, and make better BEER! The competition from the Twin Cities is coming
looking for them! :-D And with the First Round in our Own Back Yard this
year, who knows????
- Al
-----Original Message-----
From: mba-bounce(a)thebarn.com [mailto:mba-bounce@thebarn.com] On Behalf Of
Steve Fletty
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:26 PM
To: mnbrewers(a)yahoogroups.com
Cc: mnbrewers(a)yahoogroups.com; mba(a)thebarn.com
Subject: Re: [mnbrewers] AHA Nationals--one club name?
This is interesting.
I started entering my beers about 6 years ago to get feedback.
I wanted to make a kiiler IPA.
I didn't win anything for a good year or so while I learned and improved my
technique.
What really helped me, however, was interacting with people like Steve Piatz
and Curt Stock. Talking to them about what they did, sharing beers, and then
taking the BJCP class helped me be a much better brewer.
Brewing in a vacuum, without sharing info and beers with other brewers, just
isn't good enough, in my opinion, if you want to be a better brewer.
This may sound unreasonable, but the key to our
success has been the
open sharing of information within the club. If I'm going to brew a
Pilsner, I go directly to the one or two members that consistently
outperform everyone else in lagers. They will in turn share any and
all information when asked. Other members are famous for other styles,
etc.
The reason this attitude permeates the club is
primarily due to one of
our former Presidents, Peter Zien. Peter single handedly developed a
"Team" concept in Quaff. No one cares which Quaff member wins, as
long as one of us wins. Everyone gets just as excited about someone
else's medal as they do about themselves. That's especially true when
a new member starts to win competitions. It really is quite a sight
to see when a new guy is met by 10 or 15 people after he wins his first
medal.