Interesting question. Not sure why anyone would keep stirring a mash
during conversion and am concerned that significant temperature may be released
causing mash temp to drop below target temperature.
Do you know if there was a heater element or flame for temperature
adjustment and do you know how long the temp was maintained?
If the grain was converted but extract was low, it may be that the sparge
flow through the grain bed didn't work well. This could be caused by
excess water flowing around the outside of the basket with minimal flow through
the center of the bed.
It may be helpful to taste the spent grain as it is removed from
the tun or basket trying to find areas of excess sweetness. If they exist,
then some more engineering is needed.
My original mash tun was a Zap Pap or something. It worked but was
real messy. The second device was a small SS tube screen in a
15 gallon stock pot. It worked ok for large batches but left way too much
sugar in the far sides of the grain bed. Extraction efficiency was between
20 and 25 gravity points per pound.
My current system uses a 3/4 inch slotted copper manifold in the
bottom of the same stockpot. It works nicely, can be disassembled for
cleaning and usually delivery 30 or more gravity points per pound of
grain.
Best suggestions for your friend would be to identify more specifics such
as the recipe, batch size, starting gravity, and better identify what he felt
was less than appropriate for his last batches.
Rick O
>>> Will Holway <brew987@yahoo.com> 01/21/02
09:49AM >>>
Hi,
I was at a birthday party on Saturday, and
met a guy
who was having a lot of problems with an all grain
system he
designed. He did have any specific gravity
to see if it was an extraction
problem, but he claimed
the beer turned out much better with his old
system
(mashing on the stove top and using Pihl's
sparging
system).
His new system consists of a 1/2 barrel keg with
a
stainless steel basket of some kind to hold the grain.
There is a welded
stirring aparatus to constantly turn
the grain in the basket (during
mashing). There is no
false bottom in the system, all of the grain
is
contained within the basket. It is apparently a sealed
system so that
the water is above the top of the
basket which holds the grain (or the basket
is
submerged within the mash water).
He said that he is hitting his
temps right on the mark
(122, 140, 150).
He is thinking that when he
sparges, the water is not
coming into contact with the grain, thus resulting
in
"thin" beer. He said that last time he transferred
grains from this
system to his plastic bucket sparging
system and it works OK.
But I am
not much of a beer equipment designer (I
generally stick with a more tried
and true design
using a false bottom), so maybe one of the design
gurus
has some thoughts
...
Cheers!
WH
__________________________________________________
Do
You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/