I have not seen the article John refers to.
The idea of adding honey to secondary must be based on some honey already
being included in the primary -- How would there be a primary fermentation
without it?
I see several ideas used when making mead:
Boil the honey - It's sanitary. Steve and Bill already pointed out
the primary disadvantage - loss of honey aromatics.
Sanitize the honey by pasteurizing - I have used this one.
Put all the honey into very hot water (part of the total water)
and hold the mix at a temp (150-165) for a period of time.
I have used 160F for 30 min. Cool it down by adding the rest of the
water.
No heat - Mix honey with water - maybe use enough heat to get the
honey dissolved. Use SO2 to sanitize. That could be from sulfite or
Camden tablets.
I have known some to add more honey/water blend to top up carboys
after racking. This is thought to have two affects - keep it sweet
and adding honey character to aroma. The case I can name was a
traditional mead made from strawberry honey. He used the same honey
in all parts of the production.
Fruit:
I practice the add fruit after primary fermentation approach.
However, there are advocates on the mead lovers digest for
including in the primary.
Ken Schram (and another whose name I forgot) held a discussion
on mead making at the 2000 AHA conference. He served a melomel
he made by blending fruit with honey and water, without heat.
I think it was cherry. It was very clean.
Sanitation issues don't seem to be as critical with meads (and wines)
as they are for beers. The alcohol level is part of that.
There seems to be different ideas about these topics. I see debates
about which is best. I don't see a consensus in the mead makers.
=====
Leo Vitt
Rochester MN
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/